TruePath vs Pawshake — Which Pet Sitting App Is Better in Australia? (2026)

TruePath is an Australian-only platform; Pawshake is a Belgian-founded global marketplace operating in 25+ countries. That single difference shapes almost every comparison between them — verification standards, pricing structures, insurance, and whether the platform is actually designed around Australian pet owners or adapted for them.

The headline difference: global platform vs Australian-only

Pawshake launched in Belgium in 2013 and expanded internationally across Europe, North America, Asia, and Australia. In Australia it competes against Mad Paws, Rover, and TruePath — but the core platform is not specifically tuned for Australian conditions. What that means practically: suburb density mapping, local insurance requirements, the Australian Consumer Law framework, and the ACIC (Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission) police check system are all things Pawshake treats as a market variant rather than foundational design.

TruePath was built in Australia and exists only here. The verification process maps to ACIC National Police Checks because that's the actual standard used for childcare and aged-care workers in Australia — not a private-sector database analogue. Pricing is in AUD as a first-class concern, not a currency conversion. Insurance is structured around Australian vet cost realities. Support operates in AEST and is staffed by people who know what a "registered vet nurse" or an "NDIS mobility dog" means in a real support context.

Neither approach is inherently superior. A global platform with genuine infrastructure has real advantages — scale, sitter volume, international coverage. But for Australian pet owners who prioritise local accountability over global reach, the origin of a platform shapes nearly every interaction that matters.

Side-by-side comparison

Feature	TruePath	Pawshake
Platform origin	Australia-only	Belgium, 25+ countries
Verification model	ACIC Police Check + reference calls + in-person interview	ID verification + reference checks (online)
In-person interview	✓	—
National Police Check	ACIC standard	Varies by country
Sitter commission / fee	All-in price for owners, no checkout fee	~19% sitter commission + owner booking fee
GPS tracking on walks	✓	Sitter-dependent
Insurance	Platform-side policy, covers all walks	Pawshake own insurance product
Price transparency	One price, no checkout surprise	Listed rate + booking fee at checkout
Australia-specific features	✓	—
Cancellation policy	Platform-wide standard	Sitter-set (flexible / moderate / strict)
Review system	Post-service verified reviews	Two-way review system
Avg 30-min walk (AU)	$32 (April 2026)	Varies — no AU-specific average published
Overnight sitting avg (AU)	$88/night (April 2026)	Varies by sitter and location

Verification: what each platform actually checks

This is where TruePath and Pawshake diverge most significantly, and it's worth going through in detail because "background checked" means something different on each platform.

Pawshake requires sitters to provide government-issued ID and, in most markets, one or two character references. The verification is handled online and completed asynchronously. Pawshake reviews the submissions and the sitter's profile is activated once approved. There is no mandatory in-person step at any stage. The first time a Pawshake sitter meets a pet owner is typically at the first booking.

Pawshake does operate a two-way review system — owners rate sitters and sitters rate owners after each booking. That feedback loop creates a form of market accountability over time. Sitters with poor reviews lose bookings; those with excellent reviews build reputations. It works, up to a point. But it doesn't compensate for having no in-person gate before the first booking.

TruePath runs a three-stage process that applicants must clear before they're allowed to take their first booking:

1. ACIC National Police Check — this is not a private database search. It's the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission's national criminal history check, the same standard required for childcare workers, aged-care staff, and anyone with unsupervised access to vulnerable Australians.
2. Reference calls — two non-family references provided by the applicant, contacted directly by a TruePath team member by phone. Not an automated form, not an email ping. An actual call where we ask specific questions about the applicant's behaviour around animals, reliability, and communication.
3. In-person interview — a face-to-face meeting with a TruePath staff member, typically 30–45 minutes, often with the applicant's own dog present if they have one. We observe how they handle animals, how they respond to scenario questions, how they present.

The consequence of that third step is a 35% rejection rate — meaning more than one in three applicants who cleared the police check and reference stage didn't make it through the in-person interview. That's not a figure we've optimised for. It's the natural outcome of having a standard that involves judgment rather than just document submission.

For owners whose pets have specific needs — reactive dogs, elderly dogs with mobility limitations, dogs on post-surgery exercise restrictions, dogs with behavioural management plans from a trainer — the TruePath model means every walker on the platform has been assessed by a person, not just a database query and an online form.

Pricing and fees: how the numbers actually work

Pawshake's commission model charges sitters roughly 19% of each booking. That commission is extracted from the sitter's payout, not added to the owner's checkout price directly — but it shapes the market in predictable ways. Sitters on Pawshake set prices that account for their commission. A sitter who wants to net $30 for a walk lists closer to $37 to preserve their margin. The listed rate you see on a Pawshake profile already incorporates the sitter's commission buffer.

Then Pawshake adds a booking fee on top of the sitter's listed rate at checkout. The amount isn't a fixed percentage and isn't disclosed before you enter the payment screen. Owners commonly report a gap between the rate on the sitter's profile and the total confirmed at payment. That's not unique to Pawshake — most global marketplace platforms do this — but it produces a consistent frustration for owners who budgeted based on the listed rate.

TruePath's approach is different. One price is quoted. It's what the walker charges through the platform, inclusive of everything. The national average is $32 for a 30-minute walk (April 2026 platform data across 2,841 walks that month) and $88 per night for overnight sitting. Those numbers are what you pay at checkout.

For a single walk, the difference between platforms may be a few dollars either way and isn't necessarily material. For owners booking regularly — three walks per week over a year, or two overnight sittings a month — fee transparency compounds. At three walks a week, 52 weeks a year, even a consistent $3 checkout gap adds up to roughly $470 annually.

Services offered: what each platform covers

Both Pawshake and TruePath offer the core pet sitting and dog walking services Australian owners need most: drop-in visits, dog walking (single and group), day care, and overnight sitting either at the sitter's home or the owner's home.

Pawshake's broader marketplace occasionally surfaces more specialised services — sitters with formal animal care qualifications, farm animal experience, sitters who accept multiple pets at once, or sitters experienced with specific medical conditions. Because Pawshake operates globally, sitters can differentiate themselves in ways that a smaller verified pool doesn't always replicate.

TruePath focuses on the services with the highest booking volume in metro Australia: 30-minute and 60-minute walks, overnight sitting (at owner's home), and day care. The verified walker pool means depth of specialisation varies by suburb — some TruePath suburbs have two or three walkers with veterinary nursing backgrounds; others have one generalist walker who's very good. The platform is growing, and the range expands as sitter numbers increase.

GPS tracking and walk visibility

TruePath includes live GPS tracking on every walk as a non-negotiable platform standard. When a TruePath walk begins, owners see a live map of the route in real time. When it ends, an automatic walk summary is generated — route covered, distance, duration — and sent to the owner without the walker needing to remember to send it.

This isn't a premium feature. It's the default because TruePath's view is that knowing where your dog is shouldn't require trusting that a sitter remembered to turn on sharing.

Pawshake allows sitters to send photo updates and messages through the app, and some sitters share real-time location during walks. There's no platform standard that makes this mandatory. The quality of updates during a Pawshake booking depends on the individual sitter — which means it's great when you have a communicative sitter and silent when you don't. You usually can't tell which category you're in until you're mid-booking.

For owners whose dogs have separation anxiety (which makes the mid-walk photo genuinely useful for the owner's own anxiety as much as the dog's), for owners with elderly dogs where real-time route visibility helps spot deviations from the safe walking plan, or for owners who've simply had a bad experience with a sitter who went off-route — GPS by default is a meaningful practical difference.

Insurance: how claims work on each platform

Pawshake operates its own pet insurance product covering incidents that occur during bookings made through the platform. It's a claim-based model. If something goes wrong, the owner reports the incident, provides documentation (vet invoices, incident description, supporting information), and Pawshake assesses the claim. The timeline for claims to resolve varies.

TruePath operates a platform-side public liability policy covering every walk on the platform. Because TruePath verifies walkers extensively and maintains a 35% rejection rate at interview, the expected frequency of incidents is lower than in a large open marketplace — and that lower frequency is what allows TruePath to structure coverage differently. The intent is that covered vet costs aren't fronted by the owner and claimed back later; the platform covers them directly for qualifying incidents.

In practice, both platforms have exclusions. No platform insurance covers everything. Pre-existing conditions, certain types of incident, and situations where the owner or walker acted outside the terms of the booking are typically excluded on both sides. Before any significant booking, reading the insurance terms on whichever platform you use is worth the ten minutes it takes.

Cancellation: who controls the policy

On Pawshake, sitters set their own cancellation tier — flexible, moderate, or strict. Your refund window for a cancelled booking depends on which tier the specific sitter you booked has selected. You find this on their profile before you book, but it means there's no single "Pawshake cancellation policy" — it varies by sitter.

On TruePath, cancellation conditions are platform-wide. Every walker operates under the same standard, so you don't need to check per-sitter policy before confirming. For regular bookings, that consistency reduces cognitive overhead and avoids the scenario where a sitter you've used for months quietly switches their tier during a high-demand period.

App and booking experience

Pawshake has a mature app with solid booking infrastructure, in-app messaging, photo sharing, and a sitter search that surfaces availability by service type and date. The two-way review system is well-integrated. The app has been through multiple iterations over more than a decade of operation and shows it — feature-rich, stable, broadly well-reviewed in Australian app stores.

TruePath's app is newer and more focused. The core flow is: search your suburb, see matched walkers, book, track the walk live, receive a summary. We've deliberately kept it minimal — no social feed, no "favourite walker" leaderboards, no features that don't directly relate to booking or during-walk visibility. The GPS tracking is the centrepiece because it's what owners actually use during a walk rather than after it.

If a feature-complete app with lots of options is your priority, Pawshake is more mature. If a stripped-back, GPS-forward experience is what you want, TruePath is faster to navigate.

Who Pawshake suits

Pawshake makes genuine sense for Australian pet owners in specific situations:

• You're in a regional area. TruePath is metro-only. If you're outside the eight capital-city metros and surrounding suburbs, Pawshake has sitter coverage that TruePath simply can't match yet.
• You travel internationally. Pawshake's 25-country operation means one account, one review history, and consistent booking flow whether you're in Melbourne or London.
• You want the widest possible choice of sitter styles. A global marketplace surfaces niche experience — exotic pets, farm animals, specific breed handling — that a smaller verified pool doesn't always include.
• Your dog has unusual needs that require a sitter with specific certifications or experience that TruePath's current walker pool doesn't cover in your suburb.

Who TruePath suits

• You're in a capital-city metro across Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth, Adelaide, Canberra, Hobart, or select surrounding suburbs.
• Verification depth matters for your dog. Reactive dogs, elderly dogs with medical conditions, dogs with handling plans from a trainer, high-value breeds — all benefit more from the ACIC plus in-person interview standard than from an online verification equivalent.
• You want GPS tracking as a default, not a per-sitter question you have to ask before each booking.
• You book regularly. The all-in pricing model and platform-wide cancellation conditions remove the weekly friction of checking checkout totals and sitter-set policies.
• Australian accountability matters to you. Whether that's insurance structured around Australian vet costs, support in AEST, or a platform whose policy decisions are made in Australia rather than Brussels or Seattle.

Switching from Pawshake to TruePath

If you're moving across, the practical process is short:

1. Sign up on TruePath and add your dog's profile. Include your dog's breed, age, any relevant medical or behavioural information, and your suburb.
2. TruePath will match you with a verified walker in your suburb. Request a meet-and-greet — this is free, and it's specifically designed so you and your dog can assess the walker before committing to a booking.
3. Run one paid walk alongside an existing Pawshake booking if you want to compare directly. You're not obligated to cancel Pawshake before you have confidence in the TruePath walker.
4. Move your regular bookings across once you're comfortable. Most owners complete the transition within two to three weeks.

Your Pawshake reviews and history don't transfer — both platforms are independent. You start fresh on TruePath, which means building a relationship with your new walker from the beginning. Most TruePath owners find this is the point where the verification model pays off — meeting a walker who's already been assessed in person shifts the dynamic compared to a first meeting with a stranger from an app.

Find a TruePath walker near you

Background-checked walkers, GPS-tracked walks, and live photo updates. Most owners book their first walk within an hour.

Find a walker

FAQs

Frequently asked questions

Is Pawshake available all across Australia?

Does Pawshake do police checks in Australia?

Why does Pawshake charge sitters 19% commission?

Can I use both Pawshake and TruePath?

How does TruePath's overnight sitting price compare to Pawshake?

Does TruePath offer drop-in visits like Pawshake does?

Keep reading

compare

TruePath vs Mad Paws: Full Comparison for 2026

Side-by-side comparison of TruePath and Mad Paws — pricing, fees, walker verification, insurance, refund policy, and app features. Updated May 2026.

compare

Mad Paws Alternatives in Australia (2026) — What Else Is Out There?

Looking for an alternative to Mad Paws? Here are the best options for Australian pet owners in 2026 — including platforms, local networks, and what each one does differently.

compare

Best Dog Sitting Apps in Australia (2026) — Which Platform to Use?

Comparing TruePath, Mad Paws, Pawshake, and Rover Australia for dog sitting — overnight stays, home-boarding, sitter verification, and insurance for extended care. Updated May 2026.