Compare
Is Mad Paws Worth It in 2026? An Honest Assessment for Australian Owners
Mad Paws is Australia's largest dog walking and sitting platform, and it has genuine strengths. Here's an honest look at what Mad Paws does well, where it falls short, and when a different platform makes more sense.
By atticus · 9 min read · Last updated 17 May 2026
Mad Paws is worth it for many Australian dog owners — it is the largest platform in the country, has been operating since 2014, and has a deep sitter pool that covers areas other platforms simply don't reach. That's the honest starting point. The platform also has genuine weaknesses that owners commonly discover after booking: service fees added at checkout, sitter quality variance, and a customer service model that owners with problems sometimes find slow to respond. This assessment covers both.
What Mad Paws actually is
Mad Paws was founded in Sydney in 2014 as a marketplace connecting Australian pet owners with local pet sitters and dog walkers. It is Australia's largest platform of its kind, with a sitter pool that covers capital cities, regional centres, and many rural areas.
In 2023, Mad Paws was acquired by Rover Inc., the largest US-based pet services marketplace. Mad Paws continues to operate as a separate brand and app in Australia, with its Sydney team intact — but the corporate parent is now US-based.
The platform operates as a two-sided marketplace: owners search and book sitters, sitters set their own rates, and Mad Paws facilitates the transaction and charges fees on both sides.
Mad Paws offers walking, sitting, home-boarding, drop-in visits, and pet day care across Australia.
What Mad Paws does well
Geographic coverage
This is Mad Paws' strongest advantage. If you're in regional Australia — a town without many professional dog walkers, a coastal suburb away from metro centres, or a regional city — Mad Paws is probably the only platform with anyone available near you. The other major platforms are either metro-only (TruePath) or have smaller pools in AU (Pawshake, Rover AU).
For owners in regional areas, Mad Paws isn't a comparison decision — it's the default option because there isn't a meaningful alternative.
Platform maturity and sitter reviews
Mad Paws has been operating for over a decade. That longevity means the review ecosystem is deep — popular sitters have hundreds of reviews, and you can read detailed accounts of other owners' experiences over multiple years. On newer platforms, reviews are thin and a sitter with five bookings might be genuinely excellent or might just be new.
For owners who rely on reviews as the primary way to evaluate a sitter, Mad Paws' review depth is a real advantage.
App experience
The Mad Paws app is mature and well-designed. Searching for sitters, reading profiles, booking, and messaging are all smooth. The app has had years of iteration and reflects that investment.
Police check requirement
Mad Paws requires sitters to complete a police check before accepting bookings. This isn't universal in the industry — global platforms like Pawshake don't have this as a standard requirement. For owners who want a minimum level of criminal history screening, Mad Paws meets that bar.
Pet Protection insurance
Mad Paws offers Pet Protection insurance up to $25,000 per incident. This is the highest disclosed coverage figure of any major Australian dog care platform. For owners of dogs that may require significant veterinary care, this coverage is meaningful.
Where Mad Paws falls short
Service fees at checkout
The most common complaint owners raise about Mad Paws is the service fee. Mad Paws shows the sitter's rate on their profile, then adds a service fee at checkout. The fee is not displayed during the browsing or comparison phase — it appears when you attempt to complete a booking.
Owners who budget based on the displayed rate and then see a higher checkout total commonly report feeling misled — not because the fee is hidden in fine print, but because the point at which it's disclosed doesn't match the point at which the comparison is being made. The fee can add a meaningful percentage to individual bookings, and for owners booking regularly, it compounds.
Sitter quality variance
A large sitter pool has an inherent trade-off: some sitters are excellent, experienced, and deeply reliable. Others are newer, less experienced, or apply lower standards of care. Mad Paws' onboarding includes a police check and profile review, but no in-person interview or platform-conducted reference check. This means the quality bar is set at a minimum — and sitters above that minimum vary widely.
Owners who have good individual sitters on Mad Paws tend to have good experiences. Owners who have drawn unlucky on sitter quality tend to have difficult experiences, particularly when things go wrong and they need platform support.
Customer service response times
When something goes wrong — a sitter cancels last minute, a booking dispute arises, or an incident needs to be addressed — owners commonly describe Mad Paws' customer support as slow. A platform at Mad Paws' scale manages a very high volume of service queries, and the support model reflects that. Resolution can take days rather than hours.
For owners who book regularly and have a good sitter relationship, this rarely comes up. For owners who experience a problem, it's a significant frustration.
US corporate ownership
Mad Paws is now owned by Rover Inc. For some owners, this is immaterial — the Australian team is still operating the same app. For others, there's a preference for using a platform where the corporate entity is Australian, particularly when it comes to trust in how personal data is managed and how the platform prioritises Australian-specific standards.
Mad Paws has not changed its Australian operations in ways that are publicly visible since the acquisition — but ownership is worth knowing.
When Mad Paws makes sense
You're in a regional or rural area. Mad Paws has sitters where other platforms don't. If you're not in a metro, this is often the starting and ending point.
You need a last-minute or same-day booking. Mad Paws' larger pool means you're more likely to find availability at short notice. On smaller platforms, a last-minute gap in your usual walker's schedule may leave you with no alternative on the same platform.
You've already built a relationship with a specific Mad Paws sitter. If you have a trusted sitter on Mad Paws and your dog knows them, there's no compelling reason to disrupt that relationship. Platform-switching is disruptive for dogs and owners alike.
You're in a suburb where TruePath doesn't yet operate. TruePath is metro-only. If your suburb isn't covered, Mad Paws remains a sensible option while you wait for coverage to expand.
You want to cross-reference reviews over a long period. For a first booking with someone new, Mad Paws' review depth can help you assess a sitter with more historical information than newer platforms can provide.
When there's a better option
You want to know the total price before you reach checkout. TruePath quotes an all-in price on the walker's profile. There is no service fee added later. If pricing transparency is important to you, this is a material difference.
Verification depth matters for your specific dog. If your dog has medical needs, is elderly, is a reactive breed, or you simply want to know a walker has been assessed in person rather than online, TruePath's three-step process (police check, reference calls, in-person interview) goes further than Mad Paws' online onboarding.
You want GPS tracking on every walk. Mad Paws doesn't include GPS tracking as a platform standard — it depends on the individual walker. TruePath builds live tracking into every walk.
You've had a bad experience with customer service. If you've been through a dispute resolution process on Mad Paws and found it slow or unsatisfying, a platform with a smaller, more managed pool may offer faster resolution — both because incidents are less frequent and because the support surface is smaller.
The honest summary
Mad Paws is a legitimate, well-established platform that serves a genuine need in the Australian market. For many owners, it is the most practical choice — especially those in regional areas, those with existing sitter relationships, and those who value the depth of the review ecosystem.
Its weaknesses are real: the checkout fee model catches owners off guard, the quality variance in a large unvetted pool is higher than on platforms with stricter pre-approval, and customer service at scale is slower than on smaller platforms. None of these are dealbreakers for most owners, but they are worth knowing before you book.
The question of whether Mad Paws is "worth it" depends on what you're comparing it to. Compared to finding a local walker on Facebook or a noticeboards app — yes, easily. Compared to a platform with stricter verification and all-in pricing — that depends on your suburb, your dog, and how much you value those specific differences.
Frequently asked questions
Find a TruePath walker near you
Background-checked walkers, GPS-tracked walks, and live photo updates. Most owners book their first walk within an hour.
Find a walkerKeep reading
compare
TruePath vs Mad Paws: Full Comparison for 2026
Side-by-side comparison of TruePath and Mad Paws — pricing, fees, walker verification, insurance, refund policy, and app features. Updated May 2026.
compare
Mad Paws Fees Explained — What You Actually Pay as an Owner and Sitter
A clear breakdown of Mad Paws fees for owners and sitters — service charges, commission, Pet Protection insurance, and how the total cost compares to what's quoted upfront.
compare
Mad Paws Alternatives in Australia (2026) — What Else Is Out There?
Looking for an alternative to Mad Paws? Here are the best options for Australian pet owners in 2026 — including platforms, local networks, and what each one does differently.